翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R v Hutt
・ R v Hydro-Québec
・ R v Incedal
・ R v Instan
・ R v JA
・ R v Jim
・ R v Jobidon
・ R v Jones
・ R v Jordan
・ R v Jorgensen
・ R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge
・ R v K
・ R v Kang-Brown
・ R v Kapp
・ R v Keegstra
R v Kewelram
・ R v Khan
・ R v Khan (South Africa)
・ R v Khelawon
・ R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia
・ R v Korsten
・ R v Kouri
・ R v Krymowski
・ R v Laba
・ R v Labaye
・ R v Ladouceur
・ R v Latimer
・ R v Latimer (1997)
・ R v Lavallee
・ R v Lawrence


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Kewelram : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Kewelram

''R v Kewelram''〔1922 AD 213.〕 is an important case in South African law. It was heard in the Appellate Division, Bloemfontein, on 15 February 1922, with judgment handed down on 6 March. The judges were Innes CJ, Solomon JA, Maasdorp JA, De Villiers JA and Juta JA.
== Facts ==
The appellant was convicted by a jury of arson on an indictment which charged him with setting fire to the store of one "M," with the intent to injure "M" in his property. The appellant was the occupant of the store, and his stock in it was insured against fire. The jury found, upon certain questions put to it by the presiding judge,
* that the appellant set fire to his stock with the object of defrauding the insurance company;
* that the fire damaged the building; and
* that the appellant must have known and realised that that would be the result.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Kewelram」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.